I was reading through the many case updates that arrived in my inbox the other morning and one really stood out to me: the case of Nottinghamshire v LH [2021] EWHC 2584. It is a judgement of the High Court under its inherent jurisdiction, and it relates to a child. So it wouldn’t normally catchContinue reading ““Authorisation …would serve only to protect the local authority from acting unlawfully””
Tag Archives: inherent jurisdiction
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court: the regular red herring
I covered the basics of what the inherent jurisdiction is about in my previous post here. What this post will discuss is the reasons why it doesn’t provide a solution in the vast majority of cases. The first issue that presents is obtaining sufficient evidence to make a case to begin with. The type ofContinue reading “The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court: the regular red herring”
Court of protection v inherent jurisdiction
I wanted talk about the difference between the Court of Protection and the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court because I have seen this cause a bit of confusion more than once in my practice. I am going to start with a bit of background, so bear with me. The inherent jurisdiction of the HighContinue reading “Court of protection v inherent jurisdiction”